Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis weren’t just producing hits in the 1980s – they were engineering a specific kind of tension that most modern AI music tools can’t even recognize as a goal, let alone achieve.

Everyone talks about what Suno and tools like it can do. Nobody talks about what they quietly take from you in return.

AI music can technically do almost everything now. Tempo, key, arrangement, timbre, dynamics. It can fake grief and fake joy and fake longing. The question nobody in the hype cycle wants to sit with is whether any of that is actually happening.

You’re not issuing commands to Suno, you’re describing a vibe to something that learned everything it knows by listening. Once that distinction clicks, the whole way you approach prompting changes.

There’s a line between messing with AI music and making AI music. I crossed it without noticing, and it changed how I hear everything I build.

The labels aren’t wrong that AI music changes everything. They’re just wrong about which part of “everything” they should be worried about.

I’ve made over a thousand songs with Suno. The ones that surprised me most weren’t the best ones technically, they were the ones that told me something about myself I wasn’t expecting.

AI music generators like Suno are changing the game faster than a moonshine runner on back roads. But is artificial intelligence killing creativity, or just democratizing it?

We’re living through the most exciting and terrifying time in music history, where machines can craft melodies that’ll make you weep or headbang. Let’s talk about what’s really happening in the AI music frontier.